Charities Accounting Standard (CAS)
SFRS for Small Entities
Financial Reporting Standards (FRSs)

Interpretations of FRSs

Exposure Draft

News Issued

Practice Directions

Singapore Government
ASC
 
 
  Home | About Us | Publication | Events | Useful Links
     
     
 

Accounting Standards

   
SFRS for Small Entities
Financial Reporting Standards (FRSs)

Interpretations of FRSs

Exposure Draft

     
     
  Practice Statements
     
     
  News
   
News Issued

Practice Directions

     
     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preface
Preface to The Interpretations of Financial Reporting Standards
INT FRS 1
Consistency - Different Cost Formulas for Inventories
INT FRS 2
Consistency - Capitalisation of Borrowing Costs
INT FRS 3
Elimination of Unrealised Profits and Losses on Transactions with Associates
INT FRS 5
Classification of Financial Instruments - Contingent Settlement Provisions
INT FRS 6
Costs of Modifying Existing Software
INT FRS 7
Introduction of the Euro
INT FRS 8
First-Time Application of FRSs as the Primary Basis of Accounting
INT FRS 9
Business Combinations - Classification either as Acquisitions or Unitings of Interests
INT FRS 10
Government Assistance - No Specific Relation to Operating Activities
INT FRS 11
Foreign Exchange - Capitalisation of Losses Resulting from Severe Currency Devaluations
INT FRS 12
Consolidation - Special Purpose Entities
INT FRS 13
Jointly Controlled Entities - Non-Monetary Contributions by Venturers
INT FRS 14
Property, Plant and Equipment - Compensation for the Impairment or Loss of Items
INT FRS 15
Operating Leases - Incentives
INT FRS 16
Share Capital - Reacquired Own Equity Instruments (Treasury Shares)
INT FRS 17
Equity - Costs of an Equity Transaction
INT FRS 18
Consistency - Alternative Methods
INT FRS 19
Reporting Currency - Measurement and Presentation of Financial Statements under FRS 21 and FRS 29
INT FRS 20
Equity Accounting Method - Recognition of Losses
INT FRS 21
Income Taxes - Recovery of Revalued Non-Depreciable Assets
INT FRS 22
Business Combinations - Subsequent Adjustment of Fair Values and Goodwill Initially Reported
INT FRS 23
Property, Plant and Equipment - Major Inspection or Overhaul Costs
INT FRS 24
Earnings Per Share - Financial Instruments and Other Contracts that May Be Settled in Shares
INT FRS 25
Income Taxes - Changes in the Tax Status of an Enterprise or its Shareholders
INT FRS 27
Evaluating the Substance of Transactions Involving the Legal Form of a Lease
INT FRS 28
Business Combinations - "Date of Exchange" and Fair Value of Equity Instruments
INT FRS 29
Disclosure - Service Concession Arrangements
INT FRS 30
Reporting Currency - Translation from Measurement Currency to Presentation Currency
INT FRS 31
Revenue - Barter Transactions Involving Advertising Services
INT FRS 32
Intangible Assets - Web Site Costs
INT FRS 33
Consolidation and Equity Method - Potential Voting Rights and Allocation of Ownership Interests
   
 
Home > Accounting Standards > Interpretations of Financial Reporting Standards 2003 > INT FRS 22
 

Interpretation of Financial Reporting Standard


INT FRS 22

 

Business Combinations - Subsequent Adjustment of Fair Values and Goodwill Initially Reported

 

Paragraph 11 of FRS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements, requires that financial statements should not be described as complying with Financial Reporting Standards unless they comply with all the requirements of each applicable Standard and each applicable Interpretation of the Financial Reporting Standard. INT FRSs are not intended to apply to immaterial items.

 

Reference: FRS 22 - Business Combinations

 
ISSUE
 
 
  1. In initially accounting for a business combination, an acquirer may not have available all evidence to be able to identify and to estimate reliably the fair values of the assets and liabilities acquired or the identifiable assets and liabilities may not yet satisfy the criteria for recognition. This may be due to the complexity of the business acquired, the need to produce and report financial information on a timely basis, or for other reasons.

  2. FRS 22.71 indicates that in accounting for a business acquisition, "identifiable assets and liabilities, which are acquired but do not satisfy the criteria…for separate recognition when the acquisition is initially accounted for, should be recognised subsequently as and when they satisfy the criteria. The carrying amounts of identifiable assets and liabilities acquired should be adjusted when, subsequent to acquisition, additional evidence becomes available to assist with the estimation of the amounts assigned to those identifiable assets and liabilities when the acquisition was initially accounted for. The amount assigned to goodwill or negative goodwill should also be adjusted, when necessary, to the extent that:
    1. the adjustment does not increase the carrying amount of goodwill above its recoverable amount, as defined in FRS 36, Impairment of Assets; and

    2. such adjustment is made by the end of the first annual accounting period commencing after acquisition (except for the recognition of an identifiable liability under paragraph 31, for which the time-frame in paragraph 31(c) applies); otherwise the adjustments to the identifiable assets and liabilities should be recognised as income or expense."

  3. The issues are, in making adjustments in the limited circumstances described
    by FRS 22.71:

    1. whether an adjustment to the initial fair values of identifiable assets and liabilities acquired should include the effects of depreciation and other changes which would have resulted if the adjusted fair values had been applied from the date of acquisition;

    2. whether a related adjustment of goodwill or negative goodwill should include the effect of amortisation of the adjusted amount assigned to goodwill or negative goodwill from the date of acquisition; and

    3. how the adjustments to identifiable assets and liabilities acquired, and to goodwill or negative goodwill, should be presented.

  4. This Interpretation does not apply to the following items as they are specifically addressed elsewhere in Financial Reporting Standards:
    1. deferred tax assets and liabilities recognised under FRS 12, paragraphs 64 through 66; and

    2. the reversal of provisions initially made for terminating or reducing the activities of the acquiree, FRS 22, paragraphs 75 and 76.
 
CONSENSUS

 

 
5.

An adjustment to the carrying amount of identifiable assets and liabilities acquired, made in the limited circumstances described under FRS 22.71, should be calculated as if the adjusted fair values had been applied from the date of acquisition. As a result, the adjustment should include both the effect of the change to the fair values initially assigned and the effect of depreciation and other changes which would have resulted if the adjusted fair values had been applied from the date of acquisition.

   
6. If the adjustment to identifiable assets and liabilities is made by the end of the first annual accounting period commencing after acquisition, the carrying amount of goodwill or negative goodwill should also be adjusted, when necessary, to the amount which would have been determined if the adjusted fair values had been available at the date of acquisition. As a result, goodwill amortisation or recognition of negative goodwill is also adjusted from the date of acquisition. However, an adjustment to the carrying amount of goodwill should be made only to the extent that it does not increase the carrying amount of goodwill above its recoverable amount.
   
7. Adjustments to depreciation and amortisation, impairment charges, and other amounts, determined under paragraphs 5 and 6 of this Interpretation, should be included in net profit or loss in the respective classification of income or expense presented on the face of the income statement. Only items subsequent to the acquisition date which are required or are permitted to be credited or charged directly to equity under other Standards would be recognised in equity; this Interpretation does not alter the treatment under those other Standards.
   
DISCLOSURE
   
8. Adjustments to the carrying amounts of identifiable assets or liabilities or goodwill or negative goodwill should be disclosed and explained in the financial statements of the period in which the adjustment is made. The amount of an adjustment which relates to prior and comparative periods should also be disclosed.
   
BASIS FOR CONCLUSIONS
 
9. FRS 22.71 leaves a period of time for an acquirer, in very limited circumstances, to make a final determination of the amounts assigned to the identifiable assets and liabilities acquired and, as a consequence, make an adjustment to goodwill or negative goodwill. FRS 22.72 indicates that the time-limit is intended to prevent goodwill and negative goodwill from being re-assessed and adjusted indefinitely. However, in requiring adjustment of the assignment of fair value to identifiable assets and liabilities acquired, FRS 22.71 does not provide a basis for ignoring changes required or permitted by other standards, such as depreciation, amortisation, adjustments to fair value, accounting for a gain on the sale of an asset, etc. As a result, adjustments to depreciation and amortisation, impairment charges, and other amounts are determined as if the adjusted fair values had been applied from the date of acquisition and are included in the respective classification of income or expense presented on the face of the income statement. In addition, an enterprise applies the requirements of FRS 36 in determining the recoverable amount of goodwill. FRS 22.71(a) requires that this amount serves as a limit on an adjustment which increases goodwill. When the carrying amount of goodwill has not been decreased because of the time-limit in FRS 22.71(b), the recoverable amount of goodwill is used in determining whether the carrying amount of goodwill is impaired.
   
10. Under FRS 22.71, unless an adjustment to the carrying amount of identifiable assets and liabilities is appropriately recognised as an adjustment to goodwill or negative goodwill, it is recognised as income or expense. However, this does not change the accounting subsequent to the date of the acquisition under Standards which require or permit items to be credited or charged directly to equity. For example, for an adjustment made to the value initially recognised as acquired property, plant and equipment which is revalued subsequent to the date of the acquisition under FRS 16.29, the related revaluation surplus included in equity under paragraph 37 of FRS 16 is determined based on the adjusted fair value of the acquired property, plant and equipment. However, under paragraph 5 of this Interpretation, a decrease to the amount initially assigned to the asset would also result in an adjustment to decrease depreciation of the asset; this decrease would be reflected as a reduction to depreciation expense.
   
11. FRS 22.93 requires disclosure if the fair values of identifiable assets and liabilities can only be determined on a provisional basis. This implies that in such circumstances, the enterprise is aware that reliable estimates cannot yet be made and therefore the adjustment is not accounted for as a change in estimate addressed in paragraphs .17 through .24 of FRS 8.
   
12. FRS 22.93 also requires an enterprise to disclose and explain subsequent adjustments to provisional fair values.
   

Effective Date: INT FRS 22 comes into effect on 1 February 2003.

 

Appendix

This appendix is illustrative only and does not form part of the Interpretation. The purpose of the appendix is to illustrate the application of the Interpretation to assist in clarifying its meaning. The appendix does not address the deferred tax consequences of the adjustments indicated.

 
EXAMPLE APPLICATION OF INT FRS 22
 
Example 1
 
1. An enterprise reports financial statements for annual periods ending 31 December and does not report interim financial information. The enterprise made an acquisition on 30 September 2001. In its financial statements for the annual period ending 31 December 2001, the enterprise initially recognised goodwill of 100,000 to be amortised over 20 years. The carrying amount of goodwill at 31 December 2001 was 98,750 (the initial amount of 100,000 less amortisation of 1,250).
   
2. During 2002, the enterprise receives the results of a valuation study and concludes that 20,000 of the 100,000 initially allocated to goodwill should be allocated to property, plant and equipment assets having a remaining useful life of 5 years at the date of acquisition.
   
3. The adjustment to the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment assets is measured at the adjusted fair value at the date of the acquisition of 20,000, less the amount which would have been recognised as depreciation of the adjusted fair value (1,000 at 31 December 2001).
   
4. As the adjustment is made by the enterprise prior to the end of the first annual accounting period commencing after acquisition, the carrying amount of goodwill is also adjusted for the reduction in value at the date of the acquisition of 20,000, and a reduction in amortisation (250 at 31 December 2001).
   
5. The 1,000 increase in the depreciation of property, plant and equipment and the reduction in goodwill amortisation of 250 have the net effect of reducing net profit for the year ended 31 December 2002 by 750 relating to the comparative year ended 31 December 2001.
   
6. In its annual financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2002, the enterprise discloses that an adjustment to the carrying amount of identifiable assets and liabilities acquired was made during 2002, because a valuation study of the tangible assets acquired became available. The fact that the fair value of property, plant and equipment assets at the date of acquisition would have been increased by 20,000 with a corresponding decrease in goodwill is disclosed. The enterprise also discloses that if the adjusted fair values had been applied from the date of the acquisition, net income for the comparative year ended 31 December 2001 would have been decreased by depreciation of 1,000 and increased by a decrease in goodwill amortisation of 250, and that these effects have been included in the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2002.
   
Example 2.
   
7. This example assumes an adjustment which is in the reverse direction of Example 1. The adjustment to identifiable assets and liabilities is instead a 20,000 decrease to the amount initially allocated to property, plant and equipment assets having a remaining useful life of 5 years at 30 September 2001, the date of acquisition. Assume also that the enterprise determines that the recoverable amount of additional goodwill is only 17,000 at 31 December 2001.
   
8. The carrying amount of property, plant and equipment assets is reduced by 19,000, representing the decrease in fair value of the 20,000 less 1,000 in depreciation expense recognised through 31 December 2001.
   
9. The enterprise determines the adjusted carrying amount of goodwill relating to the 20,000 increase would be 19,750, after taking into consideration 250 in amortisation from the date of the acquisition through 31 December 2001. The enterprise recognises only 17,000 in goodwill as that is the maximum amount of the 19,750 increase that is recoverable.
   
10. The difference of 2,000 between the decrease in the fixed assets of 19,000 and the increase in goodwill of 17,000 is recognised as expense in the year ended 31 December 2002. The 1,000 decrease in the depreciation expense relating to property, plant and equipment and an increase in goodwill amortisation of 250 have the net effect of increasing net profit for the year ended 31 December 2002 by 750 relating to the prior comparative period. Net profit for this period is also decreased by an impairment loss of 2,750.
   
11. In its annual financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2002, the enterprise discloses that an adjustment to the carrying amount of identifiable assets and liabilities acquired was made during 2002 as a valuation study of the tangible assets acquired became available. The fact that the fair value of property, plant and equipment assets at the date of acquisition had been decreased by 20,000 with a corresponding increase in goodwill is disclosed. The enterprise also discloses that if the adjusted fair values had been applied from the date of the acquisition, net income for the comparative year ended 31 December 2001 would have been decreased by an impairment loss of 2,750 and by additional goodwill amortisation of 250, and increased by a reduction to depreciation expense of 1,000, and that these effects have been included in the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2002.
 
 
 
TOP
 

Last reviewed on 11 December 2007
This site is best viewed using IE 6.0 with 800 x 600 screen resolution

 
  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use