| |
| Home > Accounting Standards > Interpretations of Financial Reporting Standards 2003 > INT FRS 17 |
| |
Interpretation of Financial Reporting Standard
|
|
| |
Equity - Costs of an Equity Transaction |
| |
Paragraph 11 of FRS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements, requires that financial statements should not be described as complying with Financial Reporting Standards unless they comply with all the requirements of each applicable Standard and each applicable Interpretation of the Financial Reporting Standard. INT FRSs are not intended to apply to immaterial items. |
| |
Reference: FRS 32, Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation |
| |
ISSUE |
| |
| |
- An enterprise typically incurs various costs in issuing a financial instrument classified as equity under FRS 32 or in acquiring its own equity instruments. Those costs might include registration and other regulatory fees, amounts paid to legal, accounting, and other professional advisors, printing costs, stamp duties and internal costs of the enterprise such as the use of management and other resources. Costs such as underwriting fees may, in some cases, be deducted by the financial intermediaries directly from the proceeds of a share issuance.
- The issues are:
- what is comprised by the transaction costs of issuing equity instruments or of acquiring an enterprise's own equity instruments; and
- how such transaction costs should be accounted for by the enterprise.
- This Interpretation applies to the costs of issuing or acquiring an enterprise's own instruments classified by that enterprise as equity under FRS 32 when that issuance or acquisition results in a net increase or decrease to equity (costs of an "equity transaction"). However, this Interpretation does not apply to the costs of issuing an equity instrument that are directly attributable to the acquisition of a business (see FRS 22, Business Combinations). Examples of costs that are not considered costs of an equity transaction as described in this Interpretation include the costs of listings of shares on a stock exchange, a secondary offering of shares, a share split or a stock dividend.
- FRS 32 does not apply to employers' obligations under employee share option and share purchase plans. Additionally, FRS 19, Employee Benefits, does not specify recognition and measurement requirements for equity compensation benefits. Accordingly, this Interpretation does not address recognition or measurement requirements for compensation benefits related to the issuance or acquisition of equity instruments in connection with such plans and does not apply to the costs of such transactions.
|
| |
CONSENSUS |
|
|
| 5. |
Costs of an equity transaction are comprised of only those incremental external costs directly attributable to the equity transaction (defined in paragraphs 3 and 4) which would otherwise have been avoided. |
| |
|
| 6. |
The transaction costs of an equity transaction should be accounted for as a deduction from equity, net of any related income tax benefit. The costs of a transaction which fails to be completed should be expensed. |
| |
|
| 7. |
Transaction costs that relate to the issuance of a compound instrument that contains both a liability and an equity element should be allocated to the component parts in proportion to the allocation of proceeds. |
| |
|
| 8. |
Transaction costs that relate jointly to more than one transaction, for example costs of a concurrent offering of some shares and stock exchange listing of other shares, should be allocated to those transactions using a basis of allocation which is rational and consistent with similar transactions. |
| |
|
DISCLOSURE |
| |
|
| 9. |
The amount of transaction costs accounted for as a deduction from equity in the period should be disclosed separately. The related income taxes recognised directly in equity should also be included in the disclosure of the aggregate amount of current and deferred income tax credited or charged to equity. |
| |
|
BASIS FOR CONCLUSIONS |
| |
| 10. |
Paragraph 61 of the FRS Framework explains that funds contributed by shareholders may be shown as a separate component of equity. FRS 8.05 together with Paragraphs 90-94 of the FRS Framework indicate that all items of income and expense should be included in the determination of net profit or loss unless an FRS requires or permits otherwise. |
| |
|
| 11. |
FRS 32.A8 indicates that any change in equity recognised by the enterprise from re-acquiring and cancelling its own equity instruments represents a transfer between those holders of equity who have given up their equity interest and those who continue to hold an equity interest, rather than a gain or loss of the enterprise. By analogy, INT FRS 16 concludes that the acquisition and subsequent re-sale by an enterprise of its own equity instruments gives rise to neither gain nor loss to the enterprise. Thus, net profit or loss for the period is not affected by purchase and sale transactions of an enterprise involving its own equity instruments. |
| |
|
| 12. |
Transaction costs incurred as a necessary part of completing the equity transaction are accounted for as part of the transaction to which they relate. Linking the equity transaction and costs of the transaction reflects the total cost of the transaction in equity. This approach achieves a result which is consistent with FRS 32.31 which indicates that the classification of a financial instrument in the balance sheet determines whether interest, dividends, losses and gains relating to that instrument are reported in the income statement. As a result, losses relating to a financial instrument classified as equity of the issuer are reported by the issuer as movements in equity. |
| |
|
| 13. |
Linking the transaction costs to an equity transaction implies that costs subject to this Interpretation should be limited to those external costs which would otherwise have been avoided and are associated with instruments of the issuing enterprise that are classified by that enterprise as equity under FRS 32.
|
| |
|
| 14. |
Examples of costs which would not be considered transaction costs under this Interpretation are allocations of internal administrative costs and costs of compensation to employees. Allocation of internal administrative costs to transaction costs is also prohibited under FRS 39.17 which provides analogous guidance on financial instruments. |
| |
|
| 15. |
FRS 1.86(b) requires separate presentation of changes in equity resulting from items of income or expense required by another standard to be recognised directly to equity. Under FRS 12.59, current and deferred tax is charged directly or credited directly to equity if the tax relates to items that are credited or charged directly to equity. FRS 12.79(a) requires disclosure of aggregate current and deferred tax relating to items charged or credited to equity. |
| |
|
Effective Date: INT FRS 17 comes into effect on 1 February 2003. Changes in accounting policies should be accounted for according to the transitional requirements in FRS 8.40. |
| |
| |
| |
|
| |